This is a page with a different slant on designing and implementing small, safe experiments.
There are times when I cannot speak directly to a reader or member of the public. Instead, I can respond to some questions that arise on this page.
Health warning: my comments here are for specific individuals. They will know who they are. What I say may not be relevant to other readers. Indeed, my comment may not be helpful to the intended reader, as I rarely have the full facts.
It’s just my best shot or effort and it can be put to one side, if needs be!
So here goes:
TOPIC: can I develop strategies to help me with a friend who is dependent on me?
The dilemma here, as I see it, is that there is only so much time and energy we have available for all the things we need to do during the day, and for all the people we know. It’s easier to want to change that, than to make it so.
That said, I do see a few lines of experimentation that connect one with another:
Assessing your own needs and priorities: https://your-nudge.com/using-the-inverted-tree-and-body-scanning/ What are your priorities and options?
It’s difficult to make changes without knowing what the choices are in front of us. Often we do things we find are uncomfortable, and that, alone, does not promote change.
Communicating those needs and priorities to others by, for instance: Fogging and assertiveness. I do have a specific suggestion that might be relevant. ” I’m please you’ve found the courage to seek professional help. Now I need to take time for myself.”
“This is what I need to do [specify a couple of things] and I’d like it if you could help me see it happens”
Shift the words and sentiments about as suits but please keep the first person, present tense feature.
Step back to see the wood for the trees. Focus on yourself and the way you want to spend your time in an average day or week: this is the tricky bit as it sounds like a good idea, but rather selfish. Part of you may resist wanting to be different in this way. Most of us want to be wanted and most of us want to help. I can’t speak for all psychologists, but ……
Even so, there are different forms of ‘help’ and its worth asking: who AM I doing this ‘helping’ for? Is it more for me, than for them.
… where I say: If you follow Socrates, then taking unthinking advice on small, safe experiments, might be be counter-productive.
I trust this advice is clear and I can imagine it sounds rather harsh. I suspect you will not be used to stepping away from others – maybe more used to stepping toward. Even so, explore possibilities and make sure your own needs ARE known to important others.
Good friends know how to respect you; if they do not, then maybe they are not such good friends.
TOPIC: some feelings are difficult to label or just notice. Love is particularly tricky.
I have discussed feelings a fair bit on this website. I am going to discuss them further – with a focus on love and shame. It may well be important to consider them together as they are both complex feelings. Both can mean many different things to different people. Neither feeling has a single dimension and that has implications for safe experimenters.
Many moons ago, shortly before his marriage to Diana, Prince Charles was quizzed about love. In his response he said: love, whatever that is. Some people were outraged, as I recall, yet it seemed to me that he was being refreshingly honest. Many of us, including me, can be puzzled by that English word. There are a few Greek words here, you might like to consider!
Consider what can happen when we fall in love. It can feel like a temporary madness propelling us into plans and promises often built on shifting sands.
For many, love does not work out first time round; it did not for Charles, or for me, and a large number of other adults. That’s why the song Second Time Around (words set to the theme tune for the film Bilitis)can make much sense to many of us. Recall just a few films that cast light on the multiplicity of ways in which love manifests itself: just how different are the presentations in, to name just a very few: When Harry met Sally, Maurice, Brief Encounter, Brokeback Mountain, The Danish Girl and Just Another Year.
Do you recall my comment on small defeats and small victories at the bottom of this illustration of part of the scenic route?
The problem is that love can become a chameleon word; changing its meaning over time when it is convenient for me to do so. This is particularly feasible if I move the experience from one person to another person. That’s why love is often juxtaposed with hate. It seems tricky to love two people at the same time, as described in the song Torn Between Two Lovers. Too often, it easier to relabel the word!
Humans are susceptible to doing hateful things to people they once loved.
Therefore, from my point of view, the word, love, is best understood when we consider what we do to other people. That might increase our awareness of the choices we have about the actions we take in the face of mixed sensations and high emotions.
There are safe experiments to be found on these pages:
Love Languages: where specific actions demonstrating ‘love’ are described.
Sex where I discuss the five love languages further – along with some old favourites.
……and there is a summary illustration that might be of interest at:
I include in this commentary on shame some attention to its close relative, guilt.
Are Shame and Guilt one-and-the-same, or different labels for things we feel? In therapy, they are seen as different feelings; Guilt follows a known neural pathway; it is built in to almost all of us. It serves to deter us from unhelpful behaviour.
Shame, by contrast, is a complex feeling. True, it’s built-in to most of us as well and yet has a large role in telling us who we are; our relationship with it is a feature of our personality. Shame is part of our character, like letters through seaside rock. It makes a ‘statement’ about me (and you) and has a part in saying who I am (and you). The neural pathways that make up your ‘shame’ are not the same as mine. There may be common features but the profile varies from one person, to another.
If we are not careful, shame can take over our being. BUT we are more than one specific feeling. Shame – like love and hate – is triggered by a ‘part’ of you. Some of the work done in therapy is around identifying those ‘parts’. It considers the ‘conversations’ from our past and explores how they are now, in the present.
Therapy can help us to increase the choices available to us through exploring your experience of Love and Shame. Both feelings need to be experienced but it is the quality of the communication between loving and shameful ‘parts’ that is, in my view, more likely to establish an outcome; the next do-able thing.
So shame is a unique to you and me – shaped over many years, via many and varied messages from care takers and authority figures. Some of those messages would have been consistent and others inconsistent. Some of the contradictions may well have placed us in more than one double bind.
Recently, I was able to attend a training event with Kathy Steele and much of her material will prove helpful to clients and therapists, alike. After all, loving and feeling shamed happens to virtually everyone. How do we look both of them in the eye?
Here is a comment on safe experiments relating to emotions, with specific reference to shame.
Experimenting with the Inner Critic and our internal dialogue
It’s not comfortable to feel Shame. Shame is a harsh driver, a harsh task-master or task-mistress. Almost all of us have a ‘part’ commonly labelled the Inner Critic. That part is engaged in an internal dialogue with other ‘parts’; it can nag and demean us. The Inner Critic is intimately involved in triggering our Shame response.
I trust this comment will lead to some achievable safe experimenting.